tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6943742117095698492.post3469546212261344053..comments2009-05-30T11:18:34.275+02:00alexhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04497659736099795725noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6943742117095698492.post-9733473165356732362008-03-12T11:53:57.000+01:002008-03-12T11:53:57.000+01:00yes, the problem is that at the moment google is the main gate to the internet. It's very risky cause it gives too much power and too much responsibilities to one single market player. I think that we should go for a more democratic model, based on some kind of distributed technology or architecture... this could be at the same time more independent and more dinamic.<BR>I don't know, but I see that by some years no new players rise from below and, if it happens, google simply buy the competitor. I think that this shouldn't be allowed.Linushttp://www.storiediviaggi.blogspot.com/noreply@blogger.com